When Should Entrepreneurs Pursue a Social Good?

Published on: Jun 14, 2016
Entrepreneurship Campus

By Entrepreneurship Campus

When Should Entrepreneurs Pursue a Social Good?

studio-shot-of-young-man-working-on-laptop

Should your company support a social good? Should it pursue a cause that benefits others beyond your immediate stakeholders? If it is a social good that I feel strongly about, then the answer is a resounding yes.

We should start by clarifying the difference between "social goods" and "corporate responsibilities," the latter of which are obligations that businesses have to their stakeholders. Companies should be held responsible for protecting their employees and the environment and otherwise conducting business in a manner that is not harmful. Performing and committing to these causes is not a social good -- it is the law.

A social good, on the other hand, is traditionally defined as "an action or item that benefits society, such as education, potable water or even access to services such as healthcare. The term implies a positive impact on an individual or society as a whole." It is not the responsibility of entrepreneurs to provide these services, though they can certainly support them through their businesses.

There are strong arguments why pursuing a social good is bad for businesses. Kevin O’Leary, a well-known investor on ABC’s Shark Tank,opined that "businesses are designed to provide returns to shareholders -- not to solve problems of communities." Further, some critics claim that the pursuit of social causes could be hurting the bottom line and creating an unsustainable businesses. Moreover, many startups with a strong social cause find it difficult to raise seed funding.

Toms Shoes, the business founded by legendary entrepreneur, Blake Mycoskie, was built and gained notoriety for its business model of donating one pair of shoes for every pair sold. Toms grew to avaluation of $625 million in 2014, but since has had problems meeting investors' expectations and hinted at scaling back its one-for-one model.

Also, Toms Shoes is not without critics, who speculate that donating shoes to underprivileged communities may be causing more harm than good by creating a culture of dependency -- the old adage "give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."

Of course, Toms Shoes is just one example among many, and for certain there are thousands of businesses who have found success pursuing a social good. The reality is that entrepreneurs should not pursue a social cause if doing so harms the mission and goals of the company, and they should certainly avoid doing so simply because it is fashionable.

Instead, entrepreneurs should pursue social causes if they are truly passionate and committed to them. Companies that have a social cause ingrained in its DNA stand a much better chance of finding success at the end of the philanthropic tunnel. Because the passion and vision must be set and embodied by the top management, including the founders, any hint at regret or changing course could ultimately derail the effort.

Also, I believe the argument that social causes hurt the bottom line are misaligned. A social cause, be it a one-to-one business model or donating a portion of revenue, is no more or less an investment than that of a new piece of equipment, a new sales manager or a new office. In fact, one could argue that capital investments are much more prone to risk and failure, since these costs are fixed rather than variable.

Entrepreneurs and stakeholders need to approach any commitment to a social cause as what it is -- an investment in the company’s future. And like any capital investment, these investments have a life cycle and need to evolve and adapt to the company’s changing business model and the changing market attitudes.

Further, with government approval at an all time low and an upcoming election with two of the most disliked candidates in decades, we may simply be no longer able to rely on the actions of our elected officials to regulate social goods. Our entrepreneurs and businesses need to lead and police each other, and while the profit motive should and will always align with rules, we need leaders to prioritize social goods to the same degree.

So the question for entrepreneurs is not whether they need a social cause to pursue -- but rather do they want one. Once committed, entrepreneurs need to be resilient to the criticisms and stay the course, just as one would do with a new piece of machinery. Only in the long term can you measure the return on investment (ROI) -- and I believe we will all conclude that any ROI on social goods will always be worth the investment.

Source: Entrepreneur.com
Photo: VisualHunt

Share post via:

Post a comment

You cannot comment as a guest, do you already have a campus profile? Login here.

Comments (3)

togeda

7/14/2020Reply

As wannenpreneurs, this article is taking us to the basics of success. Frankly it is very important that we put in place our busines valus, core principle and ethics from the onset. This will assist us not to be swayed by any wind that blows. It will serve as check and balances on our operations and actvities. Social services are very important and if we need ot offer one at any point in time, we need to understand this from the onset and include it in our strategy. In this area of social media, services offered by businesses can be influenced by public outcry in such that if an entrepreneur does not go back to the drawing table for check and balance, businesses may end up being liquidated.

eduheal

7/13/2020Reply

While it is government responsibility to provide social services to its citizens, we live in the contemporary society where many entrepreneurs are being call out on social media for not using their platforms to support a social cause. Most times if the entreprebeur is admant to respond, it affects the patronage of his or her business and it eventually affects business growth. There are also some entrepreneur that recognizes this are once in a while take up a social services and this eventually promites their visibility, leading to increase in sales and increase in revenue. I think in todays world, entrepreneurs need to weigh these two side of the coins and strike a balance.

I encourage campus members to read this article and think of what they want and can do.

6/19/2016Reply

In my opinion, there are responsibilities of an entrepreneurs and responsibilities of the government. Provision of social goods is the responsibility of the government. An entrepreneur can contribute can contribute and provide assistance to the betterment of the community and not singlehandedly solving the community’s problems. An entrepreneur can contribute as corporate social responsibility by giving educational institutions learning support materials, renovation of school blocks, assist in provision of
health facilities &equipments at hospitals, donation of incentives to security agencies to bolster security, and provision of relief materials when there is a natural disaster among others.

Newsletter

Stay up to date and sign up for our newsletter.

Entrepreneurship.de Logo

Become an entrepreneur.
There is no better alternative.

Follow us
© 2024 Stiftung Entrepreneurship